Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:08

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Alaska Airlines to launch Seattle-to-Rome nonstop flights in 2026 - KING5.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Self-learning neural network cracks iconic black holes - Phys.org
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
7 New Directions For WWE After Night Of Champions 2025 - WhatCulture.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Will Boyington – New AA NASA Office Of Communications - NASA Watch
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Safeway workers begin striking in 4 Colorado cities - 9News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Walkoff caps ‘unreal 24 hours’ for Mariners’ Cole Young - Seattle Sports
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
My husband asked me why do I keep on complaining about him cheating. Why don't I just leave?